Fascin-1 is released from proximal tubular cells in response to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and correlates with isometric vacuolization in kidney transplanted patients.

Immunosuppression based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has greatly improved organ transplantation, although subsequent nephrotoxicity significantly hinders treatment success. There are no currently available specific soluble biomarkers for CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and diagnosis relies on renal biopsy, which is costly, invasive and may cause complications. Accordingly, identification of non-invasive biomarkers distinguishing CNI-induced kidney tubular damage from that of other etiologies would greatly improve diagnosis and enable more precise dosage adjustment. For this purpose, HK-2 cells, widely used to model human proximal tubule, were treated with CNIs cyclosporine-A and FK506, or staurosporine as a calcineurin-independent toxic compound, and secretomes of each treatment were analyzed by proteomic means. Among the differentially secreted proteins identified, only fascin-1 was specifically released by both CNIs but not by staurosporine. To validate fascin-1 as a biomarker of CNI-induced tubular toxicity, fascin-1 levels were analyzed in serum and urine from kidney-transplanted patients under CNIs treatment presenting or not isometric vacuolization (IV), which nowadays represents the main histological hallmark of CNI-induced tubular damage. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and healthy volunteers were used as controls. Our results show that urinary fascin-1 was only significantly elevated in the subset of CNI-treated patients presenting IV. Moreover, fascin-1 anticipated the rise of sCr levels in serially collected urine samples from CNI-treated pulmonary-transplanted patients, where a decline in kidney function and serum creatinine (sCr) elevation was mainly attributed to CNIs treatment. In conclusion, our results point towards fascin-1 as a putative soluble biomarker of CNI-induced damage in the kidney tubular compartment.

Medium-Term Renal Function in a Large Cohort of Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients Converted From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: There is some evidence pointing toward better renal function in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) treated with once-daily tacrolimus (QD-TAC) vs. twice-daily tacrolimus (BID-TAC). METHODS: This is an extension study of a 1-year, single arm prospective study of stable KTR who were converted from BID-TAC to QD-TAC (4.9 ± 4.0 years after transplantation) in Spanish routine clinical practice. Patient and graft survival, renal function, acute rejection episodes, and other analytic parameters were assessed at 24 and 36 months after conversion. RESULTS: A total of 1798 KTR were included in the extension study. Tacrolimus doses at 36 months were significantly lower compared to those at time of conversion (-0.2 mg/day; P = 0.023). Blood levels were lower than baseline during all the study (P < 0.001). Graft and patient survival at 3 years after conversion were 93.9% and 95.1%, respectively. Compared with baseline, the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained very stable at all timepoints (56.7 ± 19.8 vs 58.1 ± 24.6 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) at month 36; P = 0.623). Even when patients reinitiating dialysis were counted as eGFR = 0, the mean eGFR was very stable. In fact, a small but significant increase was observed at 36 months versus baseline (+0.1 mL/min per 1.73 m(2); P = 0.025). An increase in proteinuria was observed at 36 months versus baseline (+0.11 g/24 h; P < 0.001). Acute rejection rates were low during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from BID-TAC to QD-TAC in a large cohort of stable KTR was safe and associated with a very stable renal function after 3 years. Comparative studies are warranted to assess the feasibility of such conversion.

Detección precoz, prevención y manejo de la insuficiencia renal en el trasplante hepático / Early detection, prevention and management of renal failure in liver transplantation

La insuficiencia renal es una complicación frecuente de la población con trasplante hepático que se asocia con una elevada morbimortalidad. Se han descrito múltiples factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de insuficiencia renal postrasplante hepático en los periodos pre y postrasplante hepático, así como en el propio momento del trasplante. Para reducir el impacto de la insuficiencia renal postrasplante hepático es necesaria una actitud activa para la identificación de los pacientes con factores de riesgo, la implementación de estrategias preventivas y la detección precoz del deterioro de la función renal. Tomando como base las evidencias publicadas y la experiencia clínica, el presente documento incluye recomendaciones para la monitorización de la función renal en los pacientes con trasplante hepático, la prevención y el manejo de la insuficiencia renal postrasplante hepático, y la derivación al nefrólogo. Asimismo, se actualizan las pautas inmunosupresoras probadas para la prevención o el control del deterioro de la función renal tras el trasplante hepático

Renal failure is a frequent complication in liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A variety of risk factors for the development of renal failure in the pre- and post-transplantation periods have been described, as well as at the time of surgery. To reduce the negative impact of renal failure in this population, an active approach is required for the identification of those patients with risk factors, the implementation of preventive strategies, and the early detection of progressive deterioration of renal function. Based on published evidence and on clinical experience, this document presents a series of recommendations on monitoring RF in LT recipients, as well as on the prevention and management of acute and chronic renal failure after LT and referral of these patients to the nephrologist. In addition, this document also provides an update of the various immunosuppressive regimens tested in this population for the prevention and control of post-transplantation deterioration of renal function

Comparing transplant glomerulopathy in the absence of C4d deposition and donor-specific antibodies to chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

INTRODUCTION: Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is the characteristic lesion of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). However, in some patients presents with no circulating HLA antibodies or C4d positivity. AIM: Patients with TG accomplishing criteria for chronic AMR were compared to patients with isolated TG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed late (>6 months) graft biopsies performed between 2007 and 2010 (n = 75). Biopsies with C4d-negative TG and no circulating donor-specific antibody were called isolated TG (n = 12), and chronic AMR was defined according to Banff consensus (n = 17). HLA antibodies were evaluated by Luminex technology. Immunohistochemistry was performed to quantify graft infiltrating cells. RESULTS: Patients with isolated TG were older (52 ± 14 vs. 35 ± 14; p = 0.0048), received grafts from older donors (54 ± 16 vs. 41 ± 18; p = 0.0554), and displayed a lower inflammation in the glomerular (g-score: 0.5 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.9; p = 0.0865; CD3 positive cells/glomeruli: 1.5 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 4.1; p = 0.0147), interstitial (i-score: 1.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 1.0; p = 0.0685; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 18 ± 11 vs. 57 ± 68; p = 0.0132), and peritubular capillary (ptc-score 0.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.9; p = 0.0089; CD45 positive cells/hpf: 3.7 ± 3.1 vs. 10.1 ± 7.4; p = 0.0290) compartments. Fifteen grafts were lost and graft survival was significantly lower in patients with chronic AMR (p = 0.0122). CONCLUSION: Isolated TG is associated with less severe allograft inflammation and with a better outcome than chronic AMR.

[Early detection, prevention and management of renal failure in liver transplantation]. / Detección precoz, prevención y manejo de la insuficiencia renal en el trasplante hepático.

Renal failure is a frequent complication in liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A variety of risk factors for the development of renal failure in the pre- and post-transplantation periods have been described, as well as at the time of surgery. To reduce the negative impact of renal failure in this population, an active approach is required for the identification of those patients with risk factors, the implementation of preventive strategies, and the early detection of progressive deterioration of renal function. Based on published evidence and on clinical experience, this document presents a series of recommendations on monitoring RF in LT recipients, as well as on the prevention and management of acute and chronic renal failure after LT and referral of these patients to the nephrologist. In addition, this document also provides an update of the various immunosuppressive regimens tested in this population for the prevention and control of post-transplantation deterioration of renal function.

Gene expression signature of tolerance and lymphocyte subsets in stable renal transplants: results of a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: In kidney transplants operational tolerance has been associated with up-regulation of B cell differentiation genes and an increased number of total, naive and transitional peripheral B cells. The aim is to evaluate tolerance biomarkers in different cohorts of stable renal transplants under immunosuppression. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted in renal transplants. We evaluate genetic tolerance signature and lymphocyte subsets in stable transplants treated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) at 1 (n=15), 5 (n=14) and 10 (n=16) years, and azathioprine-treated transplants followed 30 years (n=8). Healthy volunteers (n=10) and patients with chronic rejection (n=15) served as controls. RESULTS: We confirm that peripheral expression of IGKV1D-13 and IGKV4-1 genes by RT-PCR distinguish tolerant (n=10) from stable transplants (n=10) provided by the International Tolerance Network. Tolerance signature was defined as the lowest expression for both genes in tolerant patients. In CNI-treated patients, genetic signature of tolerance and B cells showed a time-dependent increase not observed in azathioprine-treated patients (p<0.01). Genetic tolerance signature was observed in 0% at 1, 7% at 5 and 25% at 10-years while it was not observed in azathioprine-treated and chronic rejection patients. Fifteen out of 16 CNI-treated transplants at 10 years were revaluated 3 months apart. Nine did not show the tolerance signature in any determination, 4 in one and 2 in both determinations. Genetic signature of tolerance was associated with an increase of total, naive and transitional B cells (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IGKV1D-13 and IGKV4-1 gene expression and its linked B cell populations increase during follow up in CNI-treated patients. At 10 years, 2 out of 15 CNI treated patients consistently express biomarkers associated with true tolerance. In azathioprine-treated patients these biomarkers were down-regulated.

The reproducibility and predictive value on outcome of renal biopsies from expanded criteria donors.

Reproducibility and predictive value on outcome are the main criteria to evaluate the utility of histological scores. Here we analyze the reproducibility of donor biopsy assessment by different on-call pathologists and the retrospective evaluation by a single renal pathologist blinded to clinical outcomes. We also evaluate the predictive value on graft outcome of both evaluations. A biopsy was performed in donors with any of the following: age≥55 years, hypertension, diabetes, creatinine>1.5 mg/dl, or stroke. Glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, intimal thickening, and arteriolar hyalinosis evaluated according to the Banff criteria were added to obtain a chronic score. Biopsies were classified as mild (≥3), intermediate (4-5), or advanced (6-7) damage, and unacceptable (≥8) for transplantation of 127 kidneys biopsied. Weighted κ value between both readings was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28-0.54). Evaluation of biopsies by the renal pathologist was significantly and independently associated with estimated 12-month glomerular filtration rate and a significant composite outcome variable, including death-censored graft survival and time to reach an estimated glomerular filtration rate<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Thus, there was no association between readings of on-call pathologists and outcome. The lack of association between histological scores obtained by the on-call pathologists and graft outcome suggests that a specific training on renal pathology is recommended to optimize the use of kidneys retrieved from expanded criteria donors.

Prospective assessment of antidonor cellular alloreactivity is a tool for guidance of immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Current characterization of the immune risk in renal transplant patients is only focused on the assessment of preformed circulating alloantibodies; however, alloreactive memory T cells are key players in mediating allograft rejection. Immune monitoring of antidonor alloreactive memory/effector T cells using an IFN-γ Elispot has been shown to distinguish patients at risk for immune-mediated graft dysfunction, suggesting a potential tool for immunosuppression individualization. In this nonrandomized study, we prospectively assessed donor and nondonor T-cell alloreactivity in 60 highly alloreactive patients receiving calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression and in non-T-cell alloreactive transplant recipients treated with a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen. The impact was evaluated using 1-year allograft outcome. We found a strong association between ongoing antidonor T-cell alloreactivity and histological lesions of acute T cell-mediated rejection in 6-month protocol biopsies, distinguishing those patients with better 1-year graft function, regardless of immunosuppression regimen. Interestingly, evidence for enhanced immune regulation, driven by circulating Foxp3-demethylated regulatory T cells, was only observed among patients achieving antidonor T-cell hyporesponsiveness. Thus, prospective evaluation of donor-specific T-cell sensitization may add crucial information on the alloimmune state of transplanted patients to be used in daily clinical practice.

Estimation of renal allograft half-life: fact or fiction?

INTRODUCTION: Renal allograft half-life time (t½) is the most straightforward representation of long-term graft survival. Since some statistical models overestimate this parameter, we compare different approaches to evaluate t½. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a 1-year functioning graft transplanted in Spain during 1990, 1994, 1998 and 2002 were included. Exponential, Weibull, gamma, lognormal and log-logistic models censoring the last year of follow-up were evaluated. The goodness of fit of these models was evaluated according to the Cox-Snell residuals and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was employed to compare these models. RESULTS: We included 4842 patients. Real t½ in 1990 was 14.2 years. Median t½ (95% confidence interval) in 1990 and 2002 was 15.8 (14.2-17.5) versus 52.6 (35.6-69.5) according to the exponential model (P < 0.001). No differences between 1990 and 2002 were observed when t½ was estimated with the other models. In 1990 and 2002, t½ was 14.0 (13.1-15.0) versus 18.0 (13.7-22.4) according to Weibull, 15.5 (13.9-17.1) versus 19.1 (15.6-22.6) according to gamma, 14.4 (13.3-15.6) versus 18.3 (14.2-22.3) according to the log-logistic and 15.2 (13.8-16.6) versus 18.8 (15.3-22.3) according to the lognormal models. The AIC confirmed that the exponential model had the lowest goodness of fit, while the other models yielded a similar result. CONCLUSIONS: The exponential model overestimates t½, especially in cohorts of patients with a short follow-up, while any of the other studied models allow a better estimation even in cohorts with short follow-up.

Evaluation of a limited sampling strategy to estimate area under the curve of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant patients.

Limited sampling strategies have been developed to predict full AUCs. The goal of this study was to develop a limited sampling strategy to estimate the AUC of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant patients and to evaluate its predictive performance in an independent patient population. A total of 27 tacrolimus pharmacokinetic profiles were studied. Blood samples were collected before the dose (0) and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose. The study was divided into 2 phases. In phase 1, the goal was to obtain a sampling strategy from 14 pharmacokinetic profiles. In phase 2, the bias and precision of the model were evaluated in another 13 pharmacokinetic profiles. The best correlation was achieved at 4 hours after dose (r(2) = 0.790). Stepwise multiple regression analysis determined that the abbreviated AUC at 0, 1, and 4 hours could accurately predict total AUC (r(2) = 0.965). The following formula was developed: AUC = 8.90 + 4.0C0h+ 1.77C1h + 5.47C4h. No significant differences were found between calculated and estimated AUC (165.6 +/- 41.1 and 166.7 +/- 43.2 ng.h/mL, respectively). The mean prediction error (MPE), the relative prediction error (PE), and the mean squared error (MSE) were 0.48 ng.h/mL, 0.16%, and 40.0 ng.h/mL, respectively. The limited sampling with use of the 3 levels at 0, 1, and 4 hours postdose provides accurate, reliable determination of tacrolimus AUC in renal transplant patients.